> But hey if it means farmers grow less corn then I'm all for it! It is billed as a wheat replacement. It may erode wheat acres in the future, but is unlikely

> But hey if it means farmers grow less corn then I'm all for it! It is billed as a wheat replacement. It may erode wheat acres in the future, but is unlikely to touch the corn acres. People would already be growing more wheat and less corn if the profitability was there. But it isn't. There's a reason why farmers have nicknamed wheat "poverty grass".