4 ms·
There's a lawsuit b/c Lyft feels they can show that Uber actually caused monetary damages (and violated their TOS). If Knotel could do the same, they would also
by deelowe 9y ago
There's a lawsuit b/c Lyft feels they can show that Uber actually caused monetary damages (and violated their TOS). If Knotel could do the same, they would also have a case. That's how civil law works. AFAIK, Uber wasn't accused of committing a crime in those instances.
- wccrawford 9y agoWeWork apparently gave one of their customers 1 year free of charge to stop them from going to Knotel. I'm pretty sure they could "prove damages", too.
- squeaky-clean 9y agoI don't think this counts as damages anymore than Burger King could sue McDonald's for damages for offering a coupon on Big Macs. Uber actually booked time and fake rides with competing services so they couldn't pick up legitimate riders. A more apt comparison would be creating fake companies and renting out Knotel so a location fills up and real companies can't rent working space. Then never paying Knotel.