2 ms·
Well, they explained it a couple of paragraphs later. The previous record, a 45-bit quantum simulation, took 500 Terabytes of memory. I assume there's some sor
by zellyn 9y ago
Well, they explained it a couple of paragraphs later.
The previous record, a 45-bit quantum simulation, took 500 Terabytes of memory. I assume there's some sort of terrible exponential increase that would have made 49-bit simulations require four orders of magnitude more, or something impractical. But this one did 56 bits with just 4.5 terabytes of memory.
All seems pretty clear.
- ckastner 9y agoThat's my point: impractical as it may be at the current time, I could not find an argument as to why it should generally be impossible.