3 ms·
That's an interesting idea. You are missing the part where an audiologist inspects your ear to see if there is a ton of earwax, infection, or other foreign body
by planteen 9y ago
That's an interesting idea. You are missing the part where an audiologist inspects your ear to see if there is a ton of earwax, infection, or other foreign body. There is also more test equipment than that often goes with a hearing test. I know some audiogram and reflex results can be indicative of things like a brain tumor which will result in an immediate referral to a ENT.
And there's the whole counseling aspect of telling someone they (or their child) has a hearing loss.
- solatic 9y agoChecking if an ear is affected by earwax / infection / foreign body can be carried out by a nurse, who doesn't need nearly as much education. This is besides the fact that audiologists don't typically deal with earwax / infections / foreign bodies anyway, and typically refer to an ENT anyway. Even after regulation which only permits the sale of the physical equipment which would pair with your smartphone after a prescription from an ENT who sees no sign of other problems, it would still drastically reduce costs for the end consumer, who would never need to set foot in an audiology office. And pediatric hearing loss is a fraction of all hearing loss patients... don't make the perfect the enemy of the good ;)
- planteen 9y agoSo it sounds like you are proposing a way of doing audiograms at home. I don't think this is the most significant cost of hearing aids. What is the average cost of an audiogram, maybe $100? You can already buy hearing aids online if you submit an audiogram. If you still need to visit an ENT office anyway, many larger ENT clinics (especially at hospitals) have audiologists in the clinic already.