4 ms·
For heavy users (like me) I suggest using one of many "implementations" of a auto-scihub bookmark here: https://github.com/nfahlgren/scihub_bookmark https://git
by paulhilbert 9y ago
For heavy users (like me) I suggest using one of many "implementations" of a auto-scihub bookmark here: https://github.com/nfahlgren/scihub_bookmark https://github.com/nfahlgren/scihub_bookmark
It is a great addition to an otherwise clean tor-browser...
This is not mine - but looking at the code you should notice fairly quickly that it is somehow trivial. Note also that it may be necessary to change the URL if necessary.
Lastly it should be said that sci-hub does indeed need donations - it is essentially a one-woman project and she can always use some lawyer-funds...
- mosselman 9y agoI pasted the source code on Bookmarkify so that installation is a breeze: https://bookmarkify.it/7318 https://bookmarkify.it/7318 Disclaimer: I made Bookmarkify
- Vinnl 9y agoI think the donations are mostly for running the infrastructure - I don't think she's doing much in terms of hiring lawyers. Rather, she's just ignoring the outcomes of US court cases (being based in Kazakhstan or Russia).
- patall 9y agoI prefer the custom search approach over bookmarks: I have scihub as custom search with 'sh' as key word, so I go to the address bar (Ctrl+L or similar), and type {left}sh{space}{enter}
- paulhilbert 9y agoMy usual workflow is to check citations for a paper via google scholar or getting a link from a peer which leads me directly to the paywall. From there it is a bookmark click away. In other words I always need sci-hub when I already found what I am looking for (but can't reach it). Does using sci-hub as a search engine work well?