3 ms·

The problem Bluetooth is solving is wires. It’s really something you don’t recognize how annoying it is until you don’t have to deal with it anymore. With aptX

The problem Bluetooth is solving is wires. It’s really something you don’t recognize how annoying it is until you don’t have to deal with it anymore. With aptX the audio quality isn’t bad either. Over time all of those issues (price, build quality, audio quality, battery life, etc.) will only get better, while wired headphones will by definition always have that wire...

rorykoehler 9y ago
Wires are better imo. Anyways they could and do easily offer both to keep everyone happy. No need to remove the wired option. On a side note I found this analysis of aptX very illuminating. I found it after the salesperson in my local B&W store tried tell me it was completely lossless http://www.sereneaudio.com/blog/how-good-is-bluetooth-audio-at-its-best http://www.sereneaudio.com/blog/how-good-is-bluetooth-audio-... I should add that the portable Bluetooth speaker he was demoing sounded great compared to other offerings in the market that I have heard. I wasn't sure if this was more due to the codec or the general quality of the components. The speaker in question is the Dali Kaitch https://www.dali-speakers.com/loudspeakers/active/dali-katch/ https://www.dali-speakers.com/loudspeakers/active/dali-katch... for those who are curious. Apple doesn't support aptX so it's irrelevant to cableless iPhone users.
jamesrcole 9y ago
> It’s really something you don’t recognize how annoying it is until you don’t have to deal with it anymore. I definitely recognised it while still using them! When I'm not wearing the headphones, the wires are always getting tangled. When I am wearing the headphones, the wires are always getting caught on things.
lloeki 9y ago
> The problem Bluetooth is solving is wires. It’s really something you don’t recognize how annoying it is until you don’t have to deal with it anymore. I bought an iP6S instead of a 7 just for the jack because I wasn't a fan at all. Then in the span of four months, three jacks died on me in a row. I had a spare cable for my over-ear Momentum but the two intras are dead, and having to look for a replacement suddenly brought back to my mind the whole OMTP vs CTIA mess, if they have remote volume control at all. I'm seriously considering wireless for the next ones without even having used any.
hvidgaard 9y ago
With aptX-HD you get lossless.
- rorykoehler 9y ago
  It's actually "near" lossless however one could successfully argue that it's good enough. Check out the wikipedia for details.
  - hvidgaard 9y ago
    That is something you have to enable, if you need to respect some bandwidth restriction. > The codec optionally permits a "hybrid" coding scheme for applications where average and/or peak compressed data rates must be capped at a constrained level. This involves the dynamic application of a form of "near lossless" coding – but only for those short sections of audio where completely lossless coding cannot respect the bandwidth constraints. Even for those short periods while the "near lossless" coding is active, high-definition audio quality is maintained, retaining audio frequencies up to 20 kHz and a dynamic range of at least 120 dB.

rorykoehler 9y ago

Wires are better imo. Anyways they could and do easily offer both to keep everyone happy. No need to remove the wired option. On a side note I found this analysis of aptX very illuminating. I found it after the salesperson in my local B&W store tried tell me it was completely lossless http://www.sereneaudio.com/blog/how-good-is-bluetooth-audio-at-its-best http://www.sereneaudio.com/blog/how-good-is-bluetooth-audio-... I should add that the portable Bluetooth speaker he was demoing sounded great compared to other offerings in the market that I have heard. I wasn't sure if this was more due to the codec or the general quality of the components. The speaker in question is the Dali Kaitch https://www.dali-speakers.com/loudspeakers/active/dali-katch/ https://www.dali-speakers.com/loudspeakers/active/dali-katch... for those who are curious. Apple doesn't support aptX so it's irrelevant to cableless iPhone users.

jamesrcole 9y ago

> It’s really something you don’t recognize how annoying it is until you don’t have to deal with it anymore. I definitely recognised it while still using them! When I'm not wearing the headphones, the wires are always getting tangled. When I am wearing the headphones, the wires are always getting caught on things.

lloeki 9y ago

> The problem Bluetooth is solving is wires. It’s really something you don’t recognize how annoying it is until you don’t have to deal with it anymore. I bought an iP6S instead of a 7 just for the jack because I wasn't a fan at all. Then in the span of four months, three jacks died on me in a row. I had a spare cable for my over-ear Momentum but the two intras are dead, and having to look for a replacement suddenly brought back to my mind the whole OMTP vs CTIA mess, if they have remote volume control at all. I'm seriously considering wireless for the next ones without even having used any.

hvidgaard 9y ago

With aptX-HD you get lossless.

rorykoehler 9y ago
It's actually "near" lossless however one could successfully argue that it's good enough. Check out the wikipedia for details.
- hvidgaard 9y ago
  That is something you have to enable, if you need to respect some bandwidth restriction. > The codec optionally permits a "hybrid" coding scheme for applications where average and/or peak compressed data rates must be capped at a constrained level. This involves the dynamic application of a form of "near lossless" coding – but only for those short sections of audio where completely lossless coding cannot respect the bandwidth constraints. Even for those short periods while the "near lossless" coding is active, high-definition audio quality is maintained, retaining audio frequencies up to 20 kHz and a dynamic range of at least 120 dB.