5 ms·
Great story. But doesn’t it seem like flying westward wound up being more dangerous and putting them closer to contact with the Japanese that flying the return
by erentz 9y ago
Great story. But doesn’t it seem like flying westward wound up being more dangerous and putting them closer to contact with the Japanese that flying the return route via Fiji, Kiribati, Hawaii?
- gumby 9y agoNo, consider the course of the war; immediately after taking Pearl Harbor, Japan also attacked the Philippines, Singapore, Malaysia and the Dutch and French East Indies. In Europe it would have been called Blitzkreig. All thorough 1942 they headed south along the chain of islands towards Australia. Even in December the pacific route was dangerous. The west route put the largest amount of distance between the plane and the Japanese home islands. You could imagine a southern route Aukland -> Papa'ete, Hanga Roa -> Lima which was probably completely out of any military risk, but there would not have been facilities, most notably fuel.
- toomanybeersies 9y agoI guess it's a trade-off. They flew right through the war zone in Asia, Darwin was being bombed, so was Indonesia, and then they almost got taken out by a submarine off India.
- gumby 9y agoWe're talking the first 30 days of the war. Singapore hadn't fallen yet, nor had Djakarta. Even though Darwin had been bombed (and my grandmother said that left her convinced that the whole country was about to be invaded) in reality Australia was a long way from Japanese forces. (Of course so was Hawaii). I was wrong by the way about French Indochina which had been taken after the fall of France. So hairy, but not as hairy as it would be two months later. They couldn't know that at the time of course, but they had little choice. The only other alternative would have been to stay in Aukland and then be sucked up into the US war machine as MacArthur retreated to Australia.
- gumby 9y agoI can't edit, so I want to clarify that when I wrote, "first 30 days of the war" I meant from the perspective of the plane's crew and most of the regions they planned to fly through. There were millions in Japan, Korea, Manchuria, Indochina, Germany, France, Poland, etc for whom the war had been going on for years or decades.
- erentz 9y agoRight, east across the southern pacific would make sense if there were refueling stops. But in terms of going west they wound up going via Indonesia which the Japanese busy invading, yet Fiji, Kiribati, and Hawaii weren’t being invaded (and Fiji never was, not sure about Kiribati). There may have been naval traffic they would have to overfly they were concerned about I suppose.
- Theodores 9y agoThe plane was essentially a bomber. A very big bomber designed for range. Under no circumstances was this plane to fall into enemy hands. Had they been in some older commercial plane then I am sure they could have considered their chances going East but due to the fact that they were in command of some highly advanced 'dual use' technology, going anywhere near the enemy was not an option. Because of the progress of the war and how the seaplane ended up defunct we do not appreciate that sea planes were serious high tech and vast expense.