3 ms·
That's the best counterargument you have? "Scary" chemical names? I mean, ... really? I quite assure you that if I listed all of the compounds of "Pasteurized
by ThrowawayR2 9y ago
That's the best counterargument you have? "Scary" chemical names? I mean, ... really?
I quite assure you that if I listed all of the compounds of "Pasteurized Whole Milk, Pasteurized Cream, Live Active Cultures, Cream" using standard chemistry nomenclature, the list would look far more intimidating to the average layperson.
- simonsarris 9y agoMy argument isn't scary chemical names. It's that you face a bad omega 3:6 ratio. I already said that in the first comment.
- ThrowawayR2 9y ago> My argument isn't scary chemical names. Isn't it? You're the one bandying about phrases like "...strange synthetic meal..." and touting the ingredient lists of one meal over another. As for bad omega 3:6 ratio, that's easily solved by eating something else that contains omega-3. Nobody says that Soylent is the only thing a person is permitted to eat.
- DiThi 9y ago> Nobody says that Soylent is the only thing a person is permitted to eat. But it's supposed to be able to be used that way, if one wants. AFAIK it doesn't warn to get omega-3 from time to time.
- DanBC 9y ago> Nobody says that Soylent is the only thing a person is permitted to eat. It has been marketed as a sole source of nutrition, and every conversation about Soylent on HN has people claiming it can be used as a sole source of nutrition.