3 ms·
Probably just a reference mismatch: instead of the age of the universe, they might've meant its birth/inception around ~4k B.C. (E.).
by wyldfire 9y ago
Probably just a reference mismatch: instead of the age of the universe, they might've meant its birth/inception around ~4k B.C. (E.).
- dboreham 9y agoHey when you're off by 7 orders of magnitude it doesn't matter so much!