That's a commendable lack of susceptibility to the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect. [1] It would be easy to take this biography of someone we don't and can't know, an

That's a commendable lack of susceptibility to the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect. [1] It would be easy to take this biography of someone we don't and can't know, and take it as fact, when he failed to do a good job on the biography of someone we did know. > Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray’s case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the “wet streets cause rain” stories. Paper’s full of them. > In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know. That is the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect. [1] http://larvatus.com/michael-crichton-why-speculate/ http://larvatus.com/michael-crichton-why-speculate/