3 ms·

I'm not sure that Wikipedia entry can be taken very seriously, there have been two big warnings at the top since 2015/2016: > A major contributor to this artic

I'm not sure that Wikipedia entry can be taken very seriously, there have been two big warnings at the top since 2015/2016: > A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. (March 2016) > This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. Please help improve it by removing promotional content and inappropriate external links, and by adding encyclopedic content written from a neutral point of view. (October 2015)

libertyEQ 9y ago
I am not the one making the extraordinary claim that the packaging industry is promoting recycling in order to relax environmentalists interest in solving the pollution problems of the entire planet. I made a cursory attempt to see if there was merit to the claim, but without devoting serious time I could not do it. I gave the OP what I would call the start of a research trajectory I would use to prove the claims. Usually, the burden of proof is on the claimant/ accuser. Your "analysis" that there are warnings on the entry could be improved by chasing down the supporting citations, looking at the talk page, and the edit history. This is simply more effort than I'm willing to go to in order to justify the claims made by the OP.