> ... the same discussions about data quality forever. You misunderstand, perhaps. I mean that the data itself is fraudulent, let alone the interpretations or

> ... the same discussions about data quality forever. You misunderstand, perhaps. I mean that the data itself is fraudulent, let alone the interpretations or the controls on the experiment. Many PIs have been making up the data, essentially. Pulled from thin air with a little rand() thrown on top. Now the flood gates to this behavior are open and 'accepted', at least by the people that cut the checks.