3 ms·
It is kind of understandable that RSS feeds would fade in prominence as content creators, even of more casual blogs, increasingly sought to monetize. RSS feeds
by Mediterraneo10 9y ago
It is kind of understandable that RSS feeds would fade in prominence as content creators, even of more casual blogs, increasingly sought to monetize. RSS feeds tended to present successively posted content without the ads that site owners were keen to confront users with. A person subscribing to feeds would often never need to visit the actual site and see those ads, not would they get tagged by lucrative tracking cookies. Rather they could read everything "for free" through an RSS reader. Yes, you could introduce ads into the RSS feed, but when the RSS channel is increasingly seen as something for only a tiny niche of anoraks (especially since the demise of Google Reader), no surprise that it was no longer seen as worth the trouble.
- Crespyl 9y agoOr you could simply take the route that most monetized sites with RSS did, and only include the first few paragraphs of your content in the feed. Ars Technica still does this, and it strikes a good balance between letting the user see what content is available in the tool of their choice (and whether they'd be interested in reading more), and the site/publisher having control over how the complete articles are presented. Of course, this requires the site to actually have more than a paragraph worth of actual content for any given article.