4 ms·
dd/mm/yyyy is indeed what I'll complain about: that's as unclear as possible. Did the author mean dd.mm.yyyy or mm/dd/yyyy?
by Piskvorrr 9y ago
dd/mm/yyyy is indeed what I'll complain about: that's as unclear as possible. Did the author mean dd.mm.yyyy or mm/dd/yyyy?
- cyphar 9y agoDD/MM/YYYY is more widely used than the US-only MM/DD/YYYY. Ultimately, ISO 8061 (YYYY-MM-DD) is the only really usable one.