3 ms·
But those are for dynamic typing. I was looking for static typing
by stereobooster 9y ago
But those are for dynamic typing. I was looking for static typing
- xuejie 9y agoPersonally I feel we might never get static typing for Ruby anytime soon, at least it won't be widely adopted in the community, so I'd settle on dynamic typing like this. After all, Crystal is already quite good as a Ruby+static typing solution
- stereobooster 9y agoAgain Crystal is not Ruby. https://github.com/crystal-lang/crystal/issues/4731#issuecomment-318486278 https://github.com/crystal-lang/crystal/issues/4731#issuecom... > we might never get static typing for Ruby anytime soon Yes we will not get type declarations as a part of Ruby syntax anytime soon, but this doesn't mean we can not have static type checking right now