4 ms·
Incredibly lazy headline, actually. The article doesn't say anything of the sort. No physicist is going to say "oh the universe shouldn't exist" because it ver
by mathw 9y ago
Incredibly lazy headline, actually. The article doesn't say anything of the sort.
No physicist is going to say "oh the universe shouldn't exist" because it very obviously does - what they'll say is "we have eliminated another possibility for the matter/antimatter imbalance".
When theory does not agree with observation, you need a new theory.
This is probably getting some physicists very excited, it means there may be entirely new physics to discover here!
- dukwon 9y ago> No physicist is going to say "oh the universe shouldn't exist" Read the quote from Christian Smorra in the 4th paragraph > This is probably getting some physicists very excited, it means there may be entirely new physics to discover here! The opposite. The measurement agrees with CPT symmetry. There's no hint of new physics.