3 ms·
I won't deny we're in a unique situation right now. Being one of the beneficiaries of there being a bubble, I won't deny I'm biased here. That being said, this
by agibsonccc 9y ago
I won't deny we're in a unique situation right now. Being one of the beneficiaries of there being a bubble, I won't deny I'm biased here.
That being said, this is a bit of an interesting situation because we are largely seeing an alternative set of vehicles that aren't silicon valley funding tech innovation outside of silicon valley as well as in.
Our personal situation, we are seeing larger innovation outside the valley than in in terms of both AI publishing (China) and alternative use cases. I won't try to predict when a bubble will pop, but there are both tons of capital right now as well as tons of naysayers looking for the chance to say "any minute now" and look to be right.
I really can't say yes or no on whether we will see this pop or just evolve over time. You will see articles online both saying "any minute now" and "the bubble will continue".
I'm not sure to what degree we are in a bubble as much as we are seeing money shift outside the valley.
- thisisit 9y agoCorrect me if I am wrong but the point you are trying to make is - This is unique because it is alternative funding schemes for tech but it might not be as bad because money is going/coming from outside the valley? As you say in your other posts - they are making predictable "sure" wins while some, in your opinion, are questionable specially in early stage companies. So that begs question - Do they have enough "sure" wins to bet the house worth 880 billion? Or they might be used to fund the questionable early stage companies? If it's latter, then they might end up creating a bubble.
- agibsonccc 9y agoRight on first point. Considering they are ranging the investment from public markets (nvidia) to large scale private investments like uber, I'd say they're banking on a ton of these companies going public long term to make the ROI worth it. As for some of these questionable bets, I think the goal there is the traditional unicorn moon shot type return where 1 of those investments will return the whole "pool of smaller investments". I wouldn't be surprised if they put the funding in to pools and divide up the risk like that. In general, I wouldn't be surprised if they invest in more public companies if they run out of late stage private bets to make. As for whether they create a bubble, you might be right. Like I said, I can't/won't try to comment on whether it's a bubble or not. It's just strange because we have a large foreign entity making large scale private bets in the valley as well as abroad.