4 ms·
It seems to me people over estimate the abilities of science. Obviously the conclusion “the universe shouldn’t exist” ought to be rejected as a naturalistic the
by wry_discontent 9y ago
It seems to me people over estimate the abilities of science. Obviously the conclusion “the universe shouldn’t exist” ought to be rejected as a naturalistic theory because the universe _does_ exist.
- BLKNSLVR 9y agoNothing "should" exist because the chances are so remote that any particular specific instance of anything could be described as "should exist". The sequence of events that resulted in my existence or your existence, scientifically, statistically, suggest that neither of us "should exist". What's the percentage cut-off between "should" and "shouldn't"?