The yale article doesn't mention the exact doses for which it has been tested, only once it says "high", but in the other experiments just says "supplements" -

The yale article doesn't mention the exact doses for which it has been tested, only once it says "high", but in the other experiments just says "supplements" - so it's unclear what exactly has been found out about exactly the doses I wrote about. The other talks about 1g daily as prevention. I talk about 3x1g as treatment when symptoms start to appear until they are gone. Different things. And again, I don't say my own experience is a scientificly proven thing working generally, just a personal report and maybe a thing worth trying for the curious instead of throwing a lot of bucks in other treatments. I think theres a lot of (financial) interest in suppressing that the thing I wrote about works for more than just me - and there's not much to be gained for me personally if writing about this will help others too... so, what's your motivation trying to supress me in reporting my experience?