3 ms·
> At some point, you just have to trust the experts (whoever you consider those to be) on many things. That's extremely dangerous IMO. If you have a populace t
by ShabbosGoy 9y ago
> At some point, you just have to trust the experts (whoever you consider those to be) on many things.
That's extremely dangerous IMO. If you have a populace that is not literate or engaged, you end up with a slave society. Just see the rise of the concept of a "thought leader" [1]. It's quite scary when you see the implications such a concept will have for society.
[1] https://newrepublic.com/article/143004/rise-thought-leader-how-superrich-funded-new-class-intellectual https://newrepublic.com/article/143004/rise-thought-leader-h...
- int_19h 9y agoTo repeat, it's not physically possible to judge every single thing. It doesn't matter if you're literate and engaged - there's just not enough time, even if you were to spend every hour you have on this. And most people have jobs etc.
- kobeya 9y agoThis is simply not true. Once literate it often takes a minimal amount of effort — back of the envelope calculation or google search— to do a first pass test of the veracity of a source.
- lovich 9y agoYou're still relying on another party when you do a Google search, hell if you want to get crazy about it, you are relying that you were correctly taught literacy and that when you read a word, the meaning it has for you is the same meaning the author attributed to that word. It's not guaranteed