3 ms·
Metro considers itself traditional fixed rail, not light rail. a metro area that didn't experience such a boom I was responding to the specific claim "Light
by DrScump 9y ago
Metro considers itself traditional fixed rail, not light rail.
a metro area that didn't experience such a boom
I was responding to the specific claim "Light rail will create demand to live near and locate businesses near the stations." The point isn't about whether a broad area benefits from rail (vs. no rail at all) but whether adding light rail to a fully built-out environment will drive more dense business development near the added rail and because of the addition of rail. I don't know of any USA data that supports that.
- asveikau 9y agoOk. I thought you meant transit in general. Take a ride from the Seattle airport to downtown on the light rail sometime, then. You will see a lot of nice looking apartments that didn't used to be there. And you will see some less nice neighborhoods interspersed.
- doingmything 9y agoColumbia City is a perfect example of this