3 ms·
Because what you're primarily saving with public transport is not the cost of the vehicles themselves, but all the infrastructure needed if people who would oth
by avar 9y ago
Because what you're primarily saving with public transport is not the cost of the vehicles themselves, but all the infrastructure needed if people who would otherwise take the bus all own cars.
Sure, if the 50 people on the bus all buy used beaters you'll probably come out ahead, but once you start thinking about the real cost of the land in big cities needed to park those 50 cars it gets expensive real fast, and that's before factoring in extra load on the road system and other externalities.
- njarboe 9y agoYes, I agree. That's why a multi-level tunnel system with automatic vehicles is needed if we would like to have our world get better instead of worse. Hope we can try it and see if it works at least.
- PhasmaFelis 9y agoMulti-level tunnel systems, cool as they might be, aren't exactly a major improvement cost-wise.