Not only it is a bit annoying way to present the data, it tries to hide bs interpretations in it. For instance, when Trump said that when he is going to reduce

Not only it is a bit annoying way to present the data, it tries to hide bs interpretations in it. For instance, when Trump said that when he is going to reduce the taxes, jobs would come roaring back in. To prove how this wouldn't happen, pedal.tech tries to study the amount of growth, companies who currently pay less than 20% tax, showed. But that's a ridiculous way to see the merit of that argument. Imagine if a teacher said, "I am going to reduce the amount of time people currently spend in doing homework from 3 hours to 2 hours. This will result in more well-round development of students as they will have more time to do other things. Now of course not all students spend 3 hours doing homework, some spend more than 3 hrs, some 2 hrs, some no time at all. So according to pedal.tech, we need to look at any student who is spending only 2 hours and see what rounded development they are having, but that does not tell you what the students who spend 3 hours would do in their extra time, or what the students who only spend 2 hours would do (since now they are able to finish their homework).