3 ms·
> The evidence (however preliminary) was the fact that nearly all of Pro Publica’s cited rulings were in favor of conservatives. I'd still call that opinion, n
by gnaritas 9y ago
> The evidence (however preliminary) was the fact that nearly all of Pro Publica’s cited rulings were in favor of conservatives.
I'd still call that opinion, not evidence. A conservative might say those rulings were in favor of reason, not partisan. See, an alternate opinion.
- TimTheTinker 9y agoYou’re quibbling about words. If we can’t agree that one side favors a particular viewpoint over the other in a given civil case, any further discussion about the presence or absence of political bias in the ruling or selection of the ruling is impossible.
- gnaritas 9y ago> You’re quibbling about words. So are you, this whole thread is you quibbling about words.