3 ms·
That's exactly what I said. I was refuting the analogy above about CPUs. It had nothing to do with feeding the wheat to animals. It was simply because his growi
by parent5446 9y ago
That's exactly what I said. I was refuting the analogy above about CPUs. It had nothing to do with feeding the wheat to animals. It was simply because his growing of wheat affected how much wheat he would buy from the market.
- Retric 9y agoHow he used it has little impact, but the fact he used it does. If he planted but did not harvest wheat then there would have been no impact on the market. The fact he used it implied there was a connection to the market.