4 ms·

Any sufficiently advanced scientist is indistinguishable from a magician

• CamelCaseName 9y ago
  Is any sufficiently primitive magician a scientist?
  • drdeadringer 9y ago
    Is any sufficiently primitive scientist a magician?
    • _jal 9y ago
      Sufficiently magic scientists are dreamy.
• no_wizard 9y ago
  The difference being one takes brains and the other takes dark eyeliner Edit: I was making a tongue and cheek joke for all the rick and morty fans out there sorry if that was out of line
  • deleted 9y ago
    [deleted]
  • sliverstorm 9y ago
    Wait, what kind of scientists do you hang out with?
    • DonHopkins 9y ago
      Doctor Frankenfurter.
  • eric_the_read 9y ago
    FYI, I believe you may have meant "tongue in cheek": https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tongue-in-cheek https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tongue-in-cheek
    • no_wizard 9y ago
      I did, thank you. Again, I can't delete it, and I stand by having fun every once and awhile. I however apologize again if I was simply detracting.
      • __s 9y ago
        I stand by your stand by. Negative karma isn't a crime once in awhile (seems you get a 2nd nit in this thread on wordisms: 'once and awhile' is 'once in awhile')
        • dEnigma 9y ago
          I would even say that negative karma is never a crime, or even a bad thing. Just because an opinion isn't popular, doesn't mean one shouldn't voice it. (As long as it's not against the community guidelines or an actual crime)