3 ms·
I would assume so it can be tweeted. That's Twitter for you. Under 140 at all costs, even if it screws the vision impaired.
by ClassyJacket 9y ago
I would assume so it can be tweeted. That's Twitter for you. Under 140 at all costs, even if it screws the vision impaired.
- gnicholas 9y agoWell yeah they could tweet an image of text if they want (and use alt-text if they cared), but why would they handicap the website by using the same image?