3 ms·
It was more of a if you own an iPhone you are required to get all your apps through Apple and are charged accordingly so, reducing competition and ultimately be
by ProAm 9y ago
It was more of a if you own an iPhone you are required to get all your apps through Apple and are charged accordingly so, reducing competition and ultimately being fleeced with pricing.
- kuschku 9y agoYes, and that's an issue, but it's basically irrelevant compared to Google, with over 2 billion users.
- ProAm 9y agoAbuse is abuse.
- ferentchak 9y agoFirst things first
- Clubber 9y agoYes, but it isn't monopolistic abuse. You can always go to another phone and another ecosystem and probably get the very same apps.
- kgwgk 9y agoAbuse of dominant position requires dominant position.
- rocmcd 9y agoSo maybe don't buy an iPhone? There are tons of alternatives, and Apple doesn't hold a majority of the market share in any country.
- stale2002 9y agoOr maybe instead, we should open up the app market, so as to reduce the monopoly power over that market.