3 ms·

"And yes, I'm fine with the horrific, abhorrent affronts of the state being public if I'm the victim." Ok. I'm not.

• yojex 9y ago
  If an agent of the state commits a "horrific, abhorrent affront" against you, you want it to be kept secret? That's what I'm reading here.
  • s73ver_ 9y ago
    That would be a fair interpretation if that's all they did. However, we all know that law enforcement agents do lots of other things that the people involved would rather not be made public. A cop being a first responder to someone having a seizure, or consoling a rape victim, are things that I'm pretty sure those people would not want to be public.
    • mulmen 9y ago
      Ok but in that case the state did not commit an abhorrent act.
• SOLAR_FIELDS 9y ago
  There is definitely a middle ground somewhere around this. Perhaps the victim must consent (assuming the victim can?)