And as is often the case with science, here's another more recent study (2015, vs 2010 cited in the NY Times piece) which largely confirms the prior results not

And as is often the case with science, here's another more recent study (2015, vs 2010 cited in the NY Times piece) which largely confirms the prior results noting Aspen regrowth. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1890/14-0712.1/abstract http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1890/14-0712.1/abstrac... The NY Times opinion piece is clickbaity for its absolutist declaration that the prior studies are untrue, based on one new study.