3 ms·
wasm is an MVP, they fully intend to add DOM support: http://webassembly.org/docs/future-features http://webassembly.org/docs/future-features Its just that imp
by bbatha 9y ago
wasm is an MVP, they fully intend to add DOM support: http://webassembly.org/docs/future-features http://webassembly.org/docs/future-features
Its just that implementing the DOM requires a lot of other (complex) things
1. Stable JS object ABI
2. Integration with the GC garbage collector
3. Better integration with modules
Personally, I'm hoping that we actually get a lower-level subset of the DOM apis that doesn't rely on as many OO features so we can bind to it easier, and avoid more DOM manipulation overhead (though I have no idea what this would look like).
- tmzt 9y agoPersonally I'd like to see an experimental mode in Quantum/Servo with an RPC interface to render directly to the display list, possibly with an intermediary like a vector of VDOM operations.