3 ms·
I agree with you to be cautious not to assume either of these with certainty, but just to play devil's advocate: Assuming that self-driving car tech gets to th
by zenlikethat 9y ago
I agree with you to be cautious not to assume either of these with certainty, but just to play devil's advocate:
Assuming that self-driving car tech gets to the point where it's viable as a business, why _wouldn't_ you assume that it'd be huge? Trucking alone is a massive ~$700 billion/year industry in the US (https://www.selectusa.gov/logistics-and-transportation-industry-united-states https://www.selectusa.gov/logistics-and-transportation-indus...). Even if you gain only a few % points of that for autonomous vehicles you're sitting on top of billions in revenue. The auto industry adds another ~$600 billion/yr on top of that. Sounds pretty big to me, and there's lots of room to grow from there.
Now, as for monopolies in the market, I don't buy it quite as easily, but I can see it due to the usual "rich get richer" effect. Not to mention training data -- any self-driving company that starts to serve more rides will be accumulating more training data, allowing them to improve their product more and making it that much more difficult for second-in-lines. Look at Wal-Mart, where competition requires big infrastructure, they're bigger in market cap than their closest 5-10 competitors put together.
- bqe 9y agoSwitching costs for consumers is low. There is really no difference where I live between Uber and Lyft, and I could see another two or three competitors doing the exact same thing. Another industry that has low switching costs for transportation are the airlines. They had to implement rewards programs to keep customers loyal, and that still hasn't stopped the race to the bottom in terms of price.