> Fiske is publishing her defense in that journal APS Observer is a magazine, not a journal. Furthermore, Fiske was not the president of APS or an editor of t

> Fiske is publishing her defense in that journal APS Observer is a magazine, not a journal. Furthermore, Fiske was not the president of APS or an editor of the Magazine when that article was published. And even if she were, what's the problem? I see letters from the editor in most magazines I read on a very regular basis. Finally, the claim that Fiske was construing her opinion on conduct as a scientific fact is just... well. I'll refrain from calling you corrupt or deceptive because it was probably just a misunderstanding :-) > Notice how you deceptively switch to Cuddy from Fiske I actually have no idea what you're trying to say or what this refers to. Can you be more explicit?