not exactly. A company could be funded by bonds instead of shares. Bonds offer the financial obligation without the control. It's a question of social contract

not exactly. A company could be funded by bonds instead of shares. Bonds offer the financial obligation without the control. It's a question of social contract and property law if the modern legal fiction of a "corporation" should exist. > Mandating transfer of power from the owners to the workers is, very literally, Communism. A description without implying value judgements of the relative systems. That statement is definitional, void of meaning.