3 ms·
"That's a pretty strong accusation. Do you have any evidence?" Fiske is the journal editor. Fiske is allowing articles with weak stats to get published. Fiske
by mattmcknight 9y ago
"That's a pretty strong accusation. Do you have any evidence?"
Fiske is the journal editor. Fiske is allowing articles with weak stats to get published. Fiske is publishing her defense in that journal. Fiske is not publishing critical articles in that journal. That's corruption based on her position of authority.
Cuddy just had sloppy stats and her results failed to replicate. Notice how you deceptively switch to Cuddy from Fiske in your response, because you have no point about Fiske.
- throwawayjava 9y ago> Fiske is publishing her defense in that journal APS Observer is a magazine, not a journal. Furthermore, Fiske was not the president of APS or an editor of the Magazine when that article was published. And even if she were, what's the problem? I see letters from the editor in most magazines I read on a very regular basis. Finally, the claim that Fiske was construing her opinion on conduct as a scientific fact is just... well. I'll refrain from calling you corrupt or deceptive because it was probably just a misunderstanding :-) > Notice how you deceptively switch to Cuddy from Fiske I actually have no idea what you're trying to say or what this refers to. Can you be more explicit?