The observed pattern exactly fit into a previously established hypothesis and was totally unexpected. I did not slice and dice the data with multiple statistica

The observed pattern exactly fit into a previously established hypothesis and was totally unexpected. I did not slice and dice the data with multiple statistical tests. The only way it could have been related to p-hacking is that I am familiar with a bunch of biological theories and could recognize data patterns that are compatible with any of them. So, maybe a Bonferroni-type correction of 30-70x (i.e., number of theories my internal neural net has been trained on)?