> that having the misfortune of the one-in-twenty chance of getting a really interesting false positive at p = 0.05 means you either have to double down on the

> that having the misfortune of the one-in-twenty chance of getting a really interesting false positive at p = 0.05 means you either have to double down on the study being right after all or you have to quit the field? There were (are?) enough degrees of freedom in the field in every study to always meet this threshold.