3 ms·
Seems like overkill for just a static site. I'd rather upload my assets somewhere and have it served out of the box than configuring and securing a web server f
by eat_veggies 9y ago
Seems like overkill for just a static site. I'd rather upload my assets somewhere and have it served out of the box than configuring and securing a web server for arguably negligible benefit.
- stephenr 9y agoMaking your site reliant on multiple other companies' services (eg s3 relies on a heap of other aws services and can go down if those dependencies are down) just to host some static files seems overkill to me, when a single server you control can do it for you with minimal setup.