I always feel uncomfortable when researchers miss the creed ”Correlation does not imply causation”. Media jump every time - but that’s their job. In this case

I always feel uncomfortable when researchers miss the creed ”Correlation does not imply causation”. Media jump every time - but that’s their job. In this case it is a really vague study based entirely on subjective measures and the researchers don’t pause for a moment to consider causation in subjects response to visual stimuli. There are so many shortcomings to this, mostly from the press. What is reported in the news regarding the “cure” for dyslexia is base on what 1 of the 30 subjects in the study says. I am not a believer, but I encourage more research on Dyslexia. At least the experiments in this study seem easily reproducible although I don’t expect repetitions will shed much light on the cause or cure of the condition.