4 ms·
Kyoto Cabinet 1.0.0 was released
- cperciva 16y agotime efficiency: Throughput of updating is more than 100 millions query-per-second elapsed time to store one million records is 0.9 seconds for hash database, and 1.1 seconds for B+ tree database How to not do benchmarks: Cite performance numbers without ever specifying what hardware you're running on.
- yummyfajitas 16y agoJust curious; what's the difference between Kyoto Cabinet and Tokyo cabinet?
- tszming 16y agoAs stated in the web site: Compared with Tokyo Cabinet, KC is superior in concurrency, usability, and portability. Although time efficiency for single-thread is better in TC, I recommend KC from now on because multi-core/many-core CPU has been popular. However, I will keep on maintaining TC and fix bugs if they are found.