3 ms·
Of course she was suspended, taking justice into your own hands is never okay (unless you are defending yourself in the moment). She becomes judge, jury and exe
by Knufen 9y ago
Of course she was suspended, taking justice into your own hands is never okay (unless you are defending yourself in the moment). She becomes judge, jury and executioner in the moment she shares those pictures online.
- yladiz 9y agoYou could take this argument and say that women shouldn't directly say that they were raped because it's taking justice into their own hands (by telling others about the misdeed rather than letting it happen in a court). The reason she was suspended was not because she "took justice into her own hands," it was because the photo was explicit and an algorithm automatically suspended the account.
- Knufen 9y agoNo you can't. There is very fine silver lining between the two. She should have blurred out the face of the man as it can have very serious consequences(perhaps not in this case). I'm not condoning his actions but his trial should be through legal means and not a possible public lynching.
- yladiz 9y agoIt's the same as taking a photo of someone on the street in general, except this time the man flashed her. Would you say the same for someone who takes a photo with a clear face of someone on a food stand? Plus, it was 30 years ago, not yesterday, so it would be beyond the statue of limitations anyway.
- gorbachev 9y agoIf you come and kick me in the face, and I shoot a photo of you, I can't post it, because you'd be wronged? Seriously?
- liberte82 9y agoThe way things are going, you know that argument is coming next.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- ggus 9y agoexecutioner? with a 30 year old picture with no name? as I understand it, the account was suspended because too many people try to use facebook as a harassing platform. is facebook overzealous in taking down harassing images? it means that the problem is really serious.