4 ms·
I feel ya. I have three thoughts: 1. Could view it as a cultural thing. For example, some cultures might embrace minimal personal space. And, the media keep
by dogruck 9y ago
I feel ya. I have three thoughts:
1. Could view it as a cultural thing. For example, some cultures might embrace minimal personal space. And, the media keeps talking about the "tiny house movement."
2. Everything is relative. I personally opted to buy a smaller house than I could afford, and I generally try to live minimally.
3. In general, it's better for the collective good (less waste) to move in that direction. That said, technological advance might some day allow every human to live in a McMansion.
- timthelion 9y agoI grew up in a neighborhood with large houses and "horse lots" and I always dreamed of living in the apartment block in the next neighborhood over, because I had no one to play with, and the "poor kids" over there were always together.
- beingmyself2 9y agoThe tiny house movement is because people can't afford regular houses so they build glorified sheds on whatever scraps of land they can afford. Cities are breeding grounds for disease primarily because of the lack of personal space.
- IgorPartola 9y agoSee I can totally get behind what you are saying. Or at least most of it. Tiny houses require a lot of external infrastructure to make work. Again, a few people camping out in Golden Gate park is not an issue. Thousands would be. Also remember that there isn’t a big difference between tiny houses and trailers. Imagine turning SF into a trailer park. But there is a huge difference between a minimally viable shelter (electricity, plumbing, standing room, privacy) and a car or a capsule. Where exactly do you have sex? Vomit when sick? Keep a pet gold fish? Cook? Poop? All of that is possible in 400 sqft apartment and not possible in a car. So it’s not quite relative.