4 ms·
> ...it appears that as consumerism and perhaps, indulgence, rise, children become more and more scarce... Correlation doesn't imply causation. The typical exp
by wlievens 16y ago
> ...it appears that as consumerism and perhaps, indulgence, rise, children become more and more scarce...
Correlation doesn't imply causation. The typical explanations for the lower birth rates are (A) we have pensions, so we don't need more kids as a form of insurance and (B) we have less time to raise kids because all parents are working professionals. Neither of those factors have anything to do with complacency or consumerism.
- nikhilgk 16y agoA and B may not be sufficient reasons either. Here is a counter example from my home state: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerala_model#Human_Development_Index_in_1990 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerala_model#Human_Development_... Economically Kerala is a third world economy, but in Human Development Index and birth rates it is more closer to developed economies. The birth rate is at replacement level and still falling even though most people do not have sufficient pensions, most parents are not professionals and unemployment is endemic. So you will have to look beyond GDP and consumerism for falling birth rates.