2 ms·
I found these bullet points from the article pretty insightful: > - Reading was significantly faster online than in print. > - Students judged their comprehen
by speedplane 9y ago
I found these bullet points from the article pretty insightful:
> - Reading was significantly faster online than in print.
> - Students judged their comprehension as better online than in print.
> - Paradoxically, overall comprehension was better for print versus digital reading.
So with digital reading, you feel like you've learned more than print, but you've actually learned less. This seems pretty dangerous.
- Mindless2112 9y ago> This seems pretty dangerous. It sounds pretty much like the Internet as a whole.
- pls2halp 9y agoOn the note of the internet as a whole displaying this, there was a study a while ago which found "searching the Internet for explanatory knowledge creates an illusion whereby people mistake access to information for their own personal understanding of the information." http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/xge0000070 http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/xge0000070 (I first heard about it through the You Are Not So Smart podcast:https://youarenotsosmart.com/2015/11/25/yanss-063-how-search-engines-make-us-feel-smarter-than-we-really-are/ https://youarenotsosmart.com/2015/11/25/yanss-063-how-search...)