4 ms·
Well, the thing that word2vec can (and should) be understood in terms of word coincidences (and pointwise mutual information) is important, but hardly new. I t
by stared 9y ago
Well, the thing that word2vec can (and should)
be understood in terms of word coincidences (and pointwise mutual information) is important, but hardly new. I tried to explain it here:
http://p.migdal.pl/2017/01/06/king-man-woman-queen-why.html http://p.migdal.pl/2017/01/06/king-man-woman-queen-why.html.
There is a temptation to use just the word pair counts, skipping SVD, but it won't yield in the best results. Creating vectors not only compresses data, but also finds general patterns. This compression is super important for less frequent words (otherwise we get a lot of overfitting). See "Why do low dimensional embeddings work better than high-dimensional ones?" from http://www.offconvex.org/2016/02/14/word-embeddings-2/ http://www.offconvex.org/2016/02/14/word-embeddings-2/.
- taliesinb 9y agoThanks for your blog post! Are you familiar with http://www.offconvex.org/2016/07/10/embeddingspolysemy/ http://www.offconvex.org/2016/07/10/embeddingspolysemy/? I read a blog post maybe a year ago that explained word embeddings under an 'atom interpretation', in which word embeddings are really sparse combinations of 'atoms' (I don't really remember more than that). It was very interesting, but then I forgot about it. Trying to find the post again I only came up with the above paper, which is probably the same idea, but it wasn't what I originally read. Wish I could find it.