3 ms·

Apparently, yes, as this gap has not narrowed. This seems like a very low-impact way to ensure that your past salary history is not used against you. Why shoul

by rconti 9y ago

Apparently, yes, as this gap has not narrowed. This seems like a very low-impact way to ensure that your past salary history is not used against you. Why should it be? And what is the burden of simply disallowing a line of questioning, with no burdensome reporting or auditing requirements?

recursive 9y ago
If the gap was virtually unmeasurable before, and it hasn't narrowed, it doesn't exactly seem like a case for more regulation.
- KirinDave 9y ago
  It's weird how well-measured an "unmeasurable" value is...