3 ms·

He didn't say "take away property rights"

• kazinator 9y ago
  Yes; but rather that they aren't more important than people. Well, that is actually silly because under the right circumstances, it could be that the property (or any other) rights of person A are more important than all of person B as such. It's just trivially true when A = B (A and B are the same person). No right attributed to A is more important than A him or herself.
  • wu-ikkyu 9y ago
    >it could be that the property (or any other) rights of person A are more important than all of person B as such. How would you determine this? Is this not the same argument made by slave owners?