3 ms·

I don't think pg's argument relies on an objective definition of bad. The subjective one works fine. After all, the subject might be wrong! "Wrong" being subj

by sofal 16y ago

I don't think pg's argument relies on an objective definition of bad. The subjective one works fine. After all, the subject might be wrong! "Wrong" being subjective, of course.

deleted 16y ago
[deleted]
msg 16y ago
The subjective definition of bad only works if you happen to share the values. But this kind of argument does not bear examination. If we ask, "why is tech addiction bad?" or argue, "tech addiction is great because we it is a pathway to posthumanism", we immediately come to a question of this objective standard. If a subjective notion of evil is all you have, you'll start waving your hands here.