3 ms·

Well the point is whether or not this is a superconducting chip. It is. Since it is a superconducting chip, I'd like to know what OP meant when they said they m

Well the point is whether or not this is a superconducting chip. It is. Since it is a superconducting chip, I'd like to know what OP meant when they said they mixed it up, because I don't see where they said superconducting where it isn't true and relatively relevant. edit: also, I meant superconducting was (practically) required for superposition, but not vice-versa. I guess I misused the phrase one-required-for-the-other.

thethirdone 9y ago
> Since it is a superconducting chip, I'd like to know what OP meant when they said they mixed it up, because I don't see where they said superconducting where it isn't true and relatively relevant. I believe that everywhere superconducting was used it was correct and using superposition instead would be wrong. So I agree with you there.