A neat example indeed! Yeah that makes sense. Especially I guess in code-bases where such deeply-nested record updates abound everywhere repeatedly time-and-aga

A neat example indeed! Yeah that makes sense. Especially I guess in code-bases where such deeply-nested record updates abound everywhere repeatedly time-and-again --- have not run into such myself yet. Writing the above on-the-rare-occasion is hardly troublesome. But I get the idea there now. (Although in the above, half the verbosity comes from using records instead of ADTs' ctors and I believe aren't there common idiomatic "standard" GHC lang-extensions to trim record updates in a shorter fashion --- ah well, been a while, I'm dabbling more in PureScript these days which sports a terser record-updates notation anyway =)